Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse - Revision history

AI-Admin-Assistant: Category cleanup: remove Category:Migration June 2026 (founder order 2026-09-03)

2026-09-03T17:19:53Z

Category cleanup: remove Category:Migration June 2026 (founder order 2026-09-03)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:19, 3 September 2026
Line 165:		Line 165:
	'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main\|All Innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Programmes\|Programmes]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Deprivatization\|Deprivatization]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community\|Exit to Community]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Coopetition\|Co-opetition]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Main\|R&D Portal]]		'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main\|All Innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Programmes\|Programmes]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Deprivatization\|Deprivatization]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community\|Exit to Community]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Coopetition\|Co-opetition]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Main\|R&D Portal]]

	~~[[Category:Migration June 2026]]~~
	[[Category:Innovation]]		[[Category:Innovation]]

AI-Admin-Assistant: Standardise manual summary: On this page list wrapped in Template:ArticleSummary, same entries (Theo 2026-08-17)

2026-08-17T17:27:34Z

Standardise manual summary: On this page list wrapped in Template:ArticleSummary, same entries (Theo 2026-08-17)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 17 August 2026
Line 27:		Line 27:
	A tea picker, a cocoa farmer or a garment maker typically receives a small fraction of what consumers pay, not because any single manager is malicious, but because the legal architecture of global supply chains channels value toward holding companies. Reverse Abuse starts from the users' side of that chain: what if producers themselves owned the holding structures, so the surplus flowed back to them? This page presents the hypothesis, its safeguards, and how the community could take it forward.		A tea picker, a cocoa farmer or a garment maker typically receives a small fraction of what consumers pay, not because any single manager is malicious, but because the legal architecture of global supply chains channels value toward holding companies. Reverse Abuse starts from the users' side of that chain: what if producers themselves owned the holding structures, so the surplus flowed back to them? This page presents the hypothesis, its safeguards, and how the community could take it forward.

	~~'''On this page:'''~~		{{ArticleSummary\|
	* [[#what-is-it\|What is Reverse Abuse?]]		* [[#what-is-it\|What is Reverse Abuse?]]
	* [[#the-problem\|The problem: extractive financial architecture]]		* [[#the-problem\|The problem: extractive financial architecture]]
Line 39:		Line 39:
	* [[#status\|Status and next steps]]		* [[#status\|Status and next steps]]
	* [[#state-of-the-art\|State of the art]]		* [[#state-of-the-art\|State of the art]]
			}}
	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

AI-Admin-Assistant: Visible in-content table of contents (Theo 2026-08-15)

2026-08-15T17:29:39Z

Visible in-content table of contents (Theo 2026-08-15)

@@ Line 27: / Line 27: @@
 A tea picker, a cocoa farmer or a garment maker typically receives a small fraction of what consumers pay, not because any single manager is malicious, but because the legal architecture of global supply chains channels value toward holding companies. Reverse Abuse starts from the users' side of that chain: what if producers themselves owned the holding structures, so the surplus flowed back to them? This page presents the hypothesis, its safeguards, and how the community could take it forward.
-__TOC__
+'''On this page:'''
 <span id="what-is-it"></span>

AI-Admin-Assistant: Rename section to State of the art (Theo 2026-08-15)

2026-08-15T16:05:15Z

Rename section to State of the art (Theo 2026-08-15)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:05, 15 August 2026
Line 140:		Line 140:
	----		----

	<span id="~~related~~-~~research~~"></span>		<span id="state-of-the-art"></span>
	== ~~Related scientific research~~ ==		== State of the art ==
	Reusing the legal and financial engineering of multinationals for the benefit of small producers requires understanding how that engineering works. The references below document those structures and the value chains they govern.		Reusing the legal and financial engineering of multinationals for the benefit of small producers requires understanding how that engineering works. The references below document those structures and the value chains they govern.

AI-Admin-Assistant: Add Related scientific research section (Theo 2026-08-15)

2026-08-15T15:53:10Z

Add Related scientific research section (Theo 2026-08-15)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:53, 15 August 2026
Line 139:		Line 139:

	----		----

			<span id="related-research"></span>
			== Related scientific research ==
			Reusing the legal and financial engineering of multinationals for the benefit of small producers requires understanding how that engineering works. The references below document those structures and the value chains they govern.

			* Gabriel Zucman (2015), ''The Hidden Wealth of Nations: The Scourge of Tax Havens'', University of Chicago Press: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hidden_Wealth_of_Nations book page on Wikipedia] · [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabriel_Zucman Gabriel Zucman].
			* Ronen Palan, Richard Murphy and Christian Chavagneux (2010), ''Tax Havens: How Globalization Really Works'', Cornell University Press: [https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9780801476129/tax-havens/ publisher page] · [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_haven tax haven on Wikipedia].
			* Gary Gereffi, John Humphrey and Timothy Sturgeon (2005), ''The governance of global value chains'', Review of International Political Economy, 12(1): [https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805 doi:10.1080/09692290500049805] · [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_value_chain global value chain on Wikipedia].
			* Alex Nicholls and Charlotte Opal (2005), ''Fair Trade: Market-Driven Ethical Consumption'', SAGE Publications: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_trade fair trade on Wikipedia].
			* OECD (2013), ''Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting'', OECD Publishing: [https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264202719-en doi:10.1787/9789264202719-en] · [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_erosion_and_profit_shifting base erosion and profit shifting on Wikipedia].

	'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main\|All Innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Programmes\|Programmes]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Deprivatization\|Deprivatization]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community\|Exit to Community]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Coopetition\|Co-opetition]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Main\|R&D Portal]]		'''See also:''' [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Main\|All Innovations]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Programmes\|Programmes]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Deprivatization\|Deprivatization]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community\|Exit to Community]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Coopetition\|Co-opetition]] · [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Main\|R&D Portal]]

	[[Category:Migration June 2026]]		[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
	[[Category:Innovation]]		[[Category:Innovation]]

AI-Admin-Assistant: Refine tone and structure per Theo

2026-08-05T02:25:16Z

Refine tone and structure per Theo

Show changes

AI-Admin-Assistant: Rename Open Call to Open Calls; remove reputation credits (Theo 2026-08-03)

2026-08-03T19:49:54Z

Rename Open Call to Open Calls; remove reputation credits (Theo 2026-08-03)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 3 August 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|Some big companies use clever legal tricks to keep more money and pay less back to the people who actually make things. Reverse Abuse is a WikiDeal idea: use those same legal tricks (but in reverse) so that small producers and farmers keep the money themselves instead.}}		{{KidsIntro\|Some big companies use clever legal tricks to keep more money and pay less back to the people who actually make things. Reverse Abuse is a WikiDeal idea: use those same legal tricks (but in reverse) so that small producers and farmers keep the money themselves instead.}}

	<div style="background:#eef6ff;border:1px solid #4a90d9;border-left:4px solid #2a6db0;border-radius:4px;padding:9px 14px;margin:10px 0;font-size:0.9rem;">📣 <b>Preview of an Open Call (theoretical).</b> This programme previews a future [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-~~Call~~:Reverse Abuse\|Open Call for legal financial-optimization ideas]], part of a wider family of <b>Open Calls for programmes</b> (and for markets) that combine production, transformation and transport contracts. It is a <b>transition measure</b>, prospective only: <b>no deadline for now</b>, no guarantee of implementation. The Discussion tab is already open for suggestions.</div>		<div style="background:#eef6ff;border:1px solid #4a90d9;border-left:4px solid #2a6db0;border-radius:4px;padding:9px 14px;margin:10px 0;font-size:0.9rem;">📣 <b>Preview of an Open Call (theoretical).</b> This programme previews a future [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Reverse Abuse\|Open Call for legal financial-optimization ideas]], part of a wider family of <b>Open Calls for programmes</b> (and for markets) that combine production, transformation and transport contracts. It is a <b>transition measure</b>, prospective only: <b>no deadline for now</b>, no guarantee of implementation. The Discussion tab is already open for suggestions.</div>

	== Reverse Abuse ==		== Reverse Abuse ==
Line 118:		Line 118:
	* '''Not tax fraud''': optimization uses available legal provisions; no false declarations or hidden transactions		* '''Not tax fraud''': optimization uses available legal provisions; no false declarations or hidden transactions

	The programme is proposed as an R&D hypothesis for study, legal review, and community validation through [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-~~Call~~:Main\|Open Calls]]. No operational structure is established or implied by this page.		The programme is proposed as an R&D hypothesis for study, legal review, and community validation through [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main\|Open Calls]]. No operational structure is established or implied by this page.

	=== Status and Next Steps ===		=== Status and Next Steps ===
Line 126:		Line 126:
	# Legal review by volunteer or partner lawyers (via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement\|Peer Endorsement]])		# Legal review by volunteer or partner lawyers (via [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Peer Endorsement\|Peer Endorsement]])
	# Identification of pilot supply chains suitable for a proof of concept		# Identification of pilot supply chains suitable for a proof of concept
	# Structured [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-~~Call~~:Main\|Open Call]] for economists, cooperative legal experts, and supply-chain specialists		# Structured [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Calls:Main\|Open Call]] for economists, cooperative legal experts, and supply-chain specialists
	# Contract drafting within the WikiDeal [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing\|Collaborative Contract Editing]] framework		# Contract drafting within the WikiDeal [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing\|Collaborative Contract Editing]] framework

AI-Admin-Assistant: Add Category:Innovation

2026-07-22T15:57:16Z

Add Category:Innovation

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:57, 22 July 2026
Line 133:		Line 133:

	[[Category:Migration June 2026]]		[[Category:Migration June 2026]]
			[[Category:Innovation]]
	<!-- visible -->		<!-- visible -->

AI-Admin-Assistant: Attribution convention 2026-07-02: name moved to Credits page; attribution now 'WikiDeal concept'/'WikiDeal founder' with credits link; em-dash cleanup

2026-07-03T00:12:02Z

Attribution convention 2026-07-02: name moved to Credits page; attribution now 'WikiDeal concept'/'WikiDeal founder' with credits link; em-dash cleanup

AI-Admin-Assistant: Protected "Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse": Bulk protection: Gov pages = administrators only (Theo 2026-06-20) ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

2026-06-20T13:28:00Z

Protected "Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Reverse Abuse": Bulk protection: Gov pages = administrators only (Theo 2026-06-20) ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 20 June 2026
(No difference)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:12, 3 July 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{KidsIntro\|Some big companies use clever legal tricks to keep more money and pay less back to the people who actually make things. Reverse Abuse is a WikiDeal idea: use those same legal tricks — but in reverse — so that small producers and farmers keep the money themselves instead.}}		{{KidsIntro\|Some big companies use clever legal tricks to keep more money and pay less back to the people who actually make things. Reverse Abuse is a WikiDeal idea: use those same legal tricks (but in reverse) so that small producers and farmers keep the money themselves instead.}}

	<div style="background:#eef6ff;border:1px solid #4a90d9;border-left:4px solid #2a6db0;border-radius:4px;padding:9px 14px;margin:10px 0;font-size:0.9rem;">📣 <b>Preview of an Open Call (theoretical).</b> This programme previews a future [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Reverse Abuse\|Open Call for legal financial-optimization ideas]] — part of a wider family of <b>Open Calls for programmes</b> (and for markets) that combine production, transformation and transport contracts. It is a <b>transition measure</b>, prospective only: <b>no deadline for now</b>, no guarantee of implementation. The Discussion tab is already open for suggestions.</div>		<div style="background:#eef6ff;border:1px solid #4a90d9;border-left:4px solid #2a6db0;border-radius:4px;padding:9px 14px;margin:10px 0;font-size:0.9rem;">📣 <b>Preview of an Open Call (theoretical).</b> This programme previews a future [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Open-Call:Reverse Abuse\|Open Call for legal financial-optimization ideas]], part of a wider family of <b>Open Calls for programmes</b> (and for markets) that combine production, transformation and transport contracts. It is a <b>transition measure</b>, prospective only: <b>no deadline for now</b>, no guarantee of implementation. The Discussion tab is already open for suggestions.</div>

	== Reverse Abuse ==		== Reverse Abuse ==
	''Programme-type Innovation — WikiDeal R&D''		''Programme-type Innovation, WikiDeal R&D''

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
Line 12:		Line 12:
	\|-		\|-
	\| Origin		\| Origin
	\| 🟢 ~~Théo Bondolfi~~		\| 🟢 WikiDeal concept
	\|-		\|-
	\| Status		\| Status
	\| Prototype 1 — Under R&D study		\| Prototype 1, Under R&D study
	\|-		\|-
	\| Category		\| Category
Line 29:		Line 29:
	=== What is Reverse Abuse? ===		=== What is Reverse Abuse? ===

	'''Reverse Abuse''' is a proposed WikiDeal R&D programme that identifies legal mechanisms historically used by large multinationals to optimize financial flows to their own advantage — including aggressive tax optimization, tax havens, and complex holding structures — and then deploys those same '''legal mechanisms''' in the service of small producers, cooperatives, and user-governed supply chains.		'''Reverse Abuse''' is a proposed WikiDeal R&D programme that identifies legal mechanisms historically used by large multinationals to optimize financial flows to their own advantage (including aggressive tax optimization, tax havens, and complex holding structures) and then deploys those same '''legal mechanisms''' in the service of small producers, cooperatives, and user-governed supply chains.

	The name deliberately signals its logic: the same statutory and financial instruments that have been ''used against'' producers and communities are ''turned around'' and made to serve those very producers. What changes is not the legal vehicle but the '''direction of the financial flows''' and the '''beneficiary of the surplus'''.		The name deliberately signals its logic: the same statutory and financial instruments that have been ''used against'' producers and communities are ''turned around'' and made to serve those very producers. What changes is not the legal vehicle but the '''direction of the financial flows''' and the '''beneficiary of the surplus'''.
Line 37:		Line 37:
	=== The Problem: Extractive Financial Architecture ===		=== The Problem: Extractive Financial Architecture ===

	Global supply chains — tea, cocoa, garments, electronics — are often governed by financial architectures in which:		Global supply chains (tea, cocoa, garments, electronics) are often governed by financial architectures in which:

	* Multinational holding companies register intellectual property and financial instruments in low-tax jurisdictions		* Multinational holding companies register intellectual property and financial instruments in low-tax jurisdictions
Line 48:		Line 48:
	=== The Response: Same Tools, Opposite Direction ===		=== The Response: Same Tools, Opposite Direction ===

	Reverse Abuse proposes that the same statutory instruments — holding structures, subsidiary networks, entities incorporated in favourable jurisdictions — can be created and owned by '''small producers themselves''' (or by their cooperatives, syndicates, compensation funds, and user-governed platforms).		Reverse Abuse proposes that the same statutory instruments (holding structures, subsidiary networks, entities incorporated in favourable jurisdictions) can be created and owned by '''small producers themselves''' (or by their cooperatives, syndicates, compensation funds, and user-governed platforms).

	The critical difference lies in '''who controls the entity''' and '''where the financial flows end up''':		The critical difference lies in '''who controls the entity''' and '''where the financial flows end up''':
Line 75:		Line 75:
	* '''WikiDeal Programme contracts''': the standard WikiDeal contract stack (service agreement, governance charter, distribution rules) adapted to the supply chain context		* '''WikiDeal Programme contracts''': the standard WikiDeal contract stack (service agreement, governance charter, distribution rules) adapted to the supply chain context

	The result is a supply chain in which the producers '''sell to a company they own''' — meaning the margin that would have gone to an extractive intermediary remains inside the producer community.		The result is a supply chain in which the producers '''sell to a company they own''': meaning the margin that would have gone to an extractive intermediary remains inside the producer community.

	=== Why This Works: A Transition Mechanism ===		=== Why This Works: A Transition Mechanism ===

	Reverse Abuse is conceived as a '''transition mechanism''' — not a permanent parallel economy, but a structured pathway toward producer sovereignty. Its logic operates on two levels simultaneously:		Reverse Abuse is conceived as a '''transition mechanism''': not a permanent parallel economy, but a structured pathway toward producer sovereignty. Its logic operates on two levels simultaneously:

	# '''Direct benefit''': producers immediately receive a larger share of the value they create		# '''Direct benefit''': producers immediately receive a larger share of the value they create
	# '''Systemic drainage''': as more producers migrate to user-owned supply chains, the financial flows available to extractive companies diminish; companies whose business model depends on captive producer relationships naturally contract when those producers choose alternative structures		# '''Systemic drainage''': as more producers migrate to user-owned supply chains, the financial flows available to extractive companies diminish; companies whose business model depends on captive producer relationships naturally contract when those producers choose alternative structures

	This mirrors the WikiDeal [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Deprivatization\|Deprivatization]] logic applied to global supply chains: the goal is not confrontation but migration — redirecting participation away from extractive structures and toward community-controlled ones.		This mirrors the WikiDeal [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Deprivatization\|Deprivatization]] logic applied to global supply chains: the goal is not confrontation but migration, redirecting participation away from extractive structures and toward community-controlled ones.

	=== Example: A Tea Supply Chain ===		=== Example: A Tea Supply Chain ===
Line 101:		Line 101:
	Reverse Abuse is classified as a '''programme-type innovation''': it is expressed not as a single marketplace or rule, but as an '''ensemble of contracts''' that together constitute a supply-chain governance programme. It draws on and extends several existing WikiDeal mechanisms:		Reverse Abuse is classified as a '''programme-type innovation''': it is expressed not as a single marketplace or rule, but as an '''ensemble of contracts''' that together constitute a supply-chain governance programme. It draws on and extends several existing WikiDeal mechanisms:

	* [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community\|Exit to Community]] — progressive transfer of control to users/producers		* [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Exit To Community\|Exit to Community]]: progressive transfer of control to users/producers
	* [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Deprivatization\|Deprivatization]] — reclaiming extractive markets as user-governed commons		* [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Deprivatization\|Deprivatization]]: reclaiming extractive markets as user-governed commons
	* [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing\|Collaborative Contract Editing]] — contracts versioned and community-validated		* [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:Collaborative Contract Editing\|Collaborative Contract Editing]]: contracts versioned and community-validated
	* [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups\|User Groups]] — autonomous communities with their own governance		* [[Gov/en/Portal:R&D/Innovations:User Groups\|User Groups]]: autonomous communities with their own governance

	In the Programmes framework, Reverse Abuse would most naturally be explored under the '''Market''' and '''Social''' categories — specifically in contexts where existing supply chains can be progressively migrated to producer-controlled governance.		In the Programmes framework, Reverse Abuse would most naturally be explored under the '''Market''' and '''Social''' categories, specifically in contexts where existing supply chains can be progressively migrated to producer-controlled governance.

	=== Legal and Ethical Framework ===		=== Legal and Ethical Framework ===